IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v16y2013i1p45-62..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Participation or Low-Cost Care Providers? Welfare Non-profit Organisations in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Junko YAMASHITA

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the increasing number of non-profit organisations (NPOs) can be considered a vehicle for promoting participatory democracy. Based on the analysis of data generated from my research, I argue that the rise of NPOs in Japan should not be uncritically considered the enhancement of participatory democracy. Based on the analysis of data generated from my research on NPOs that provide welfare services for older people in Japan, this article reveals that the degree and the location of participation of NPOs vary widely, depending on the organisational types of NPOs. NPO participation in welfare policy planning does not necessarily mean that their members also take part in such a process. NPO members participate in the delivery of welfare services but it may not be that they also participate in decision-making or policy-planning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Junko YAMASHITA, 2013. "Citizen Participation or Low-Cost Care Providers? Welfare Non-profit Organisations in Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 45-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:45-62.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jys028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Layon Carlos Cezar & Letícia Dias Fantinel, 2018. "The sales of craft over a Lively Talk and a cup of Coffee: social representations in a commercialization center of solidarity economy," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(5), pages 475-493, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:45-62.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.