IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i1p16-31..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development of attitudes toward science and technology: a longitudinal analysis of Generation X

Author

Listed:
  • Jon D Miller
  • Belén Laspra
  • Carmelo Polino
  • Glenn Branch
  • Mark S Ackerman
  • Robert T Pennock

Abstract

Research on public attitudes toward science and technology policy has relied on surveys taken at single points in time. These surveys fail to indicate how these attitudes develop or change. In this study, we use data from the Longitudinal Study of American Life that has followed a national sample of Generation X for 33 years—from middle school to midlife. We demonstrate that the critical period for the formation of attitudes toward science and technology is the 15–18 years after high school—college, work, family, and career. The attitudes formed in this period remain stable for most individuals during midlife. This work provides an important perspective for scientists, engineers, and the leadership of the scientific community in their efforts to foster positive attitudes toward science and technology and to understand the roots of concerns and reservations about science.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon D Miller & Belén Laspra & Carmelo Polino & Glenn Branch & Mark S Ackerman & Robert T Pennock, 2025. "The development of attitudes toward science and technology: a longitudinal analysis of Generation X," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 16-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:16-31.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:16-31.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.