IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i1p159-163..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of missions: a gloomy perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Molica

Abstract

This article discusses the so far understudied role of politics in the development of transformative innovation policies (TIPs) and mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs). The topic is explored through four dimensions foreshadowing critical bottlenecks and obstacles which are somewhat neglected by the current scholarly discussion around TIPs and MOIPs. The first dimension concerns the relationship to the historical time of different political visions, affecting their inclination towards the transformative ambition of TIPs and MOIPs. The second pertains to the exercise of power and its relation to TIPs and MOIPs’ emphasis on distributed agency and participation. The third addresses the capacity to deliver policy changes, a key precondition for TIPs and MOIPs. Finally, the fourth dimension relates to how political systems deal with diverse values and beliefs, essential for the experimental nature of TIPs and MOIPs. The article concludes that the current trend towards conservatism, centralization, and political polarization in many advanced economies challenges the effective adoption and deployment of TIPs and MOIPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Molica, 2025. "The politics of missions: a gloomy perspective," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 159-163.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:159-163.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:159-163.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.