IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2025i6p1257-1266..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the interplay between social distancing, innovation adoption, and privacy concerns amid the COVID-19 crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Keungoui Kim
  • Sira Maliphol
  • Dongnyok Shim
  • Changjun Lee

Abstract

Using the case of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) as a natural experiment, this study discusses how innovation policy should be designed in times of crisis when public interest and privacy concerns collide. For this purpose, the causal relationship between social distancing enforcement and innovation adoption in consideration of privacy concerns is explored by using national-level survey data. Our key findings from econometric analysis are as follows: first, the implementation of social distancing policies leads to an increase in the adoption of wearable devices. Second, the strengthening of social distancing has caused a decrease in individual privacy concerns. Finally, a decrease in individual privacy concerns leads to an increase in wearable device adoption. Social distancing during the COVID-19 not only accelerated innovation adoption but also led a decrease in privacy concerns. Our results suggest that government should play a role in safe guarding public privacy when individuals may let their guard down during times of crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Keungoui Kim & Sira Maliphol & Dongnyok Shim & Changjun Lee, 2025. "Exploring the interplay between social distancing, innovation adoption, and privacy concerns amid the COVID-19 crisis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1257-1266.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1257-1266.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1257-1266.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.