IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2025i6p1143-1155..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Donor country official development assistance in health R&D: domestic economic burden vs. medical disseminative capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Williams

Abstract

This study examines domestic determinants of donor country official development assistance (ODA) in health research and development (R&D). It argues that health R&D ODA is negatively related to domestic economic burden, i.e. pressures that donor governments face because of economic issues in their own country, while also positively influenced by long-standing capabilities in medicine and medical research that are projected globally. Using panel data on forty-four donor countries over a 6-year period, the study finds support for a negative relationship between domestic economic burden and donor country health R&D ODA. It also finds a positive relationship between medical disseminative capacity (MDC) and donor country health R&D ODA, as well as with the ratio of health R&D ODA to overall ODA. While domestic economic burden dampens the overall appetite for health R&D ODA, MDC helps to reverse this and ensures that the proportion of ODA that goes to health R&D in developing countries is increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Williams, 2025. "Donor country official development assistance in health R&D: domestic economic burden vs. medical disseminative capacity," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1143-1155.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1143-1155.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1143-1155.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.