IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2025i6p1117-1132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whose knowledge counts? Power dynamics in the co-production of knowledge and innovation in agri-food systems

Author

Listed:
  • Evelien Cronin
  • Thomas Block
  • Sylvie Fosselle
  • Elke Rogge

Abstract

The concept ‘co-production of knowledge and innovation’ (CKI) is gaining prominence. European Union (EU) research and innovation funding programmes like Horizon 2020 (H2020), Horizon Europe, and INTERREG underscore its significance as engaging diverse societal actors is often a requirement. Reality reveals disparities in actor participation in these multinational EU-funded CKI projects. As these projects are perceived as avenues for tackling ‘grand societal challenges’, such as the transition to sustainable agri-food systems, questions arise about whether they ensure equitable inclusion of diverse perspectives, enable genuine participation, and why barriers to entry persist. This study delves into the complexity of multinational CKI projects, shedding light on these questions. One H2020 and one INTERREG project are analysed using the multilevel innovation system framework incorporating a ‘power dynamics’ dimension. By including ‘power dynamics’ in an innovation system-based analysis, we offer a nuanced examination of mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion and a better understanding of potential policy intervention strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelien Cronin & Thomas Block & Sylvie Fosselle & Elke Rogge, 2025. "Whose knowledge counts? Power dynamics in the co-production of knowledge and innovation in agri-food systems," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1117-1132.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1117-1132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1117-1132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.