IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2025i6p1104-1116..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping science in artificial intelligence policy development: formulation, trends, and influences

Author

Listed:
  • Bernardo Cabral
  • Sergio Salles-Filho

Abstract

This research maps the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) policy and its scientific underpinnings. First, we analyzed the global AI policy landscape using the Overton policy documents database, which comprises millions of policy documents. Findings reveal a substantial increase in AI policy documents since 2018, with the USA, European Union (EU), and intergovernmental organizations leading policy development efforts. We also analyzed the scientific articles referenced within these policies. The USA stood out as a central hub in the production and funding of AI research, with other Global North countries playing a notable role alongside China. The research cited in AI policy documents predominantly features journals with a high-impact factor, such as Nature and Science. This analysis aims to deepen the understanding of the AI policy landscape, offering insights for academics and policymakers and contributing to managing AI’s global governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernardo Cabral & Sergio Salles-Filho, 2025. "Mapping science in artificial intelligence policy development: formulation, trends, and influences," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1104-1116.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1104-1116.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:1104-1116.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.