IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i5p939-950..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science and the nation-state: What China’s experience reveals about the role of policy in science

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline S Wagner

Abstract

China’s rapid rise and spectacular growth in science capacity reopens a discussion about the relationship between science and the nation-state. Literature suggests that science thrives within a democratic system and that scientific activities tend to have a liberalizing effect on governments. Neither of these phenomena appears evident in China’s case. Three policies, present in the earliest days of the growth of modern science, ones in common with other nations, factor into China’s science policy: (1) policies enabling protection of intellectual property, (2) encouraging mobility and skills development, and (3) government procurement of science and technology, especially through military purchases. Using Graham’s interactionist model, I suggest that policies instituted by the state-created conditions for emergence of modern science.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline S Wagner, 2024. "Science and the nation-state: What China’s experience reveals about the role of policy in science," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(5), pages 939-950.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:939-950.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:939-950.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.