IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i5p923-938..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When do trademarks improve the measurement of innovation? An analysis of innovations from Dutch SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Morales
  • Meindert Flikkema
  • Carolina Castaldi
  • Ard-Pieter de Man

Abstract

Effective innovation policymaking critically relies on monitoring innovation. An emerging literature suggests that trademarks could help measure a larger share of innovations than when only utilizing patents, particularly for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study establishes when trademarks improve the measurement of innovation compared to solely relying on patents as innovation metrics, by examining the propensity to use trademarks for non-patented innovations from SMEs. We collected multiple original samples of innovations from Dutch SMEs and assessed the extent to which trademarks and/or patents were filed for those innovations. Our results show that trademarks can improve innovation measurement for SMEs, particularly in scale-intensive and supplier-dominated industries and in some service industries—areas where patent propensities are low. Our results bear implications for monitoring innovation and evaluating science, research, and innovation policy. Overall, by combining trademark and patent data, the number of measured innovations by SMEs increases approximately by a relative of 51.8 per cent.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Morales & Meindert Flikkema & Carolina Castaldi & Ard-Pieter de Man, 2024. "When do trademarks improve the measurement of innovation? An analysis of innovations from Dutch SMEs," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(5), pages 923-938.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:923-938.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:923-938.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.