IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i4p609-617..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It is controlling, but you don’t really care.” Researchers’ perceptions of legitimation of research policy

Author

Listed:
  • Vanja Carlsson
  • Evelina Johansson Wilén

Abstract

Starting from the tension between scientific autonomy and state governing in research policy, the aim of this article is to examine how researchers who apply for funding in Sweden perceive the legitimate grounds for a new research policy in which sex and gender perspectives are integrated as criteria in assessing scientific quality. Our results show that researcher’s perception of themselves, and of the purpose of research, is compatible with dominant ideals in contemporary academic landscape, where knowledge is treated as a deliverable to external stakeholders or to meet politically formulated goals. However, according to researchers, the legitimate sources of policy influence originate from their own profession or the common interest of the people, explicitly expressed by citizens. Researchers are questioning, and find strategies to avoid, top-down state governing.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanja Carlsson & Evelina Johansson Wilén, 2024. "“It is controlling, but you don’t really care.” Researchers’ perceptions of legitimation of research policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 609-617.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:4:p:609-617.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:4:p:609-617.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.