IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i3p526-542..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen attitudes toward science and technology, 1957–2020: measurement, stability, and the Trump challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Jon D Miller
  • Belén Laspra
  • Carmelo Polino
  • Glenn Branch
  • Mark S Ackerman
  • Robert T Pennock

Abstract

In democratic societies around the world, the number of science policy decisions is increasing. One of the fundamental principles of democracy is that citizens should be able to understand the issues before them. Using a 63-year cross-sectional US data set, we use confirmatory factor analysis to construct and test a two-dimensional measure of attitude to science and technology that has been relatively stable over the last six decades. Previous and current research tells us that only one in three US adults is scientifically literate, meaning that trust in scientific expertise is important to many citizens. We find that trust in scientific expertise polarized during the Trump administration. Using the same data set, we construct two structural equation models to determine the factors that predict positive attitudes toward science and technology. Comparing 2016 and 2020, we find that the Trump attacks on science did not reduce public support for science.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon D Miller & Belén Laspra & Carmelo Polino & Glenn Branch & Mark S Ackerman & Robert T Pennock, 2024. "Citizen attitudes toward science and technology, 1957–2020: measurement, stability, and the Trump challenge," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 526-542.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:526-542.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:526-542.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.