IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i6p843-852..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public deliberation and the regulation of gene drive in the USA
[Emerging Sociotechnical Imaginaries for Gene Edited Crops for Foods in the United States: Implications for Governance]

Author

Listed:
  • William F West
  • Leah W Buchman
  • Raul F Medina

Abstract

Gene drive is a new form of biotechnology designed to bias the inheritance of selected traits in animal or plant species that reproduce sexually and have relatively short reproductive cycles. Unlike traditional breeding techniques and other forms of biotechnology, gene drive is designed to spread in wild populations. As such, the prospect of its application raises ecological and socioeconomic concerns that the current system of biotechnology regulation in the USA is ill-equipped to address. Foremost among the proposals for reform is the need for deliberative participation in decision-making by stakeholders representing a broader range of interests and analytical perspectives. As appealing as they are in the abstract, these recommendations overlook both practical and political challenges to democratic governance in administration that have received little attention.

Suggested Citation

  • William F West & Leah W Buchman & Raul F Medina, 2022. "Public deliberation and the regulation of gene drive in the USA [Emerging Sociotechnical Imaginaries for Gene Edited Crops for Foods in the United States: Implications for Governance]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 843-852.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:843-852.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:843-852.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.