IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i6p819-829..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of expectations in the bioeconomy—Hopes, disillusionments, and conflicting futures
[Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy]

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Ahola-Launonen
  • Sofi Kurki

Abstract

The initial European Union bioeconomy policies have been criticized for their overriding economic emphasis at the cost of social and environmental sustainability. The updated policy aims to respond to more ambitious sustainability goals but fails to do so coherently. In this article, we examine the dynamics of bioeconomy expectations. We analyze the development of bioeconomy policy as a technoscientific imaginary by dissecting the changed expectations, their underlying tensions, and the directions to which their combinations guide policymaking. We find that the revised expectations are contradictory and culminate in two key tensions regarding the bioeconomy’s expected scale and socioeconomic paradigm. To enable assessment of the outcomes of conflicting expectations, we examine images of potential futures that rise up from combinations of the key tensions. For this, we use a framework of the four generic scenario narratives. The analysis provides a tool for reflection for assessing the directions and priorities of evolving bioeconomy discourse and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Ahola-Launonen & Sofi Kurki, 2022. "Dynamics of expectations in the bioeconomy—Hopes, disillusionments, and conflicting futures [Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 819-829.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:819-829.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:819-829.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.