IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i4p582-591..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Heads of Departments Find It Meaningful to Engage with Gender Balance Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian Anette Lagesen

Abstract

This article investigates how heads of department (HoDs) understand and implement gender balance policies in Norway, considered to be among the most gender-equal countries in the world. Previous studies have found that HoDs often resist enacting gender equality policies. This interview-based study provides a more optimistic and nuanced picture. Employing domestication theory and narrative analysis, this study shows that HoDs understand gender balance as an important goal and responsibility in principle. However, to actively engage with implementation, HoDs needed to see how improving gender balance would benefit their departments and help reach other goals. This sense-making was pivotal for motivation to enact measures and change their practices. The article brings new knowledge on how HoDs may work to improve the gender balance among faculty and generates deeper insight into the critical co-production of sense-making and enactment of practices related to improving gender balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian Anette Lagesen, 2021. "How Heads of Departments Find It Meaningful to Engage with Gender Balance Policies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 582-591.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:582-591.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marja Vehviläinen & Liekki Valaskivi, 2022. "Situated gender equality in regional research and innovation: Collaborative knowledge production [Policies as Gendering Practices: Re-Viewing Categorical Distinctions]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 561-572.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:582-591.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.