IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v47yi4p571-580..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges and solutions in developing legitimate online participation for EU biodiversity and ecosystem services policies

Author

Listed:
  • Liisa Varumo
  • Riikka Paloniemi
  • Eszter Kelemen

Abstract

To support legitimate European Union (EU) biodiversity policy development, there is a growing momentum to engage society in these policy processes and build meaningful and inclusive dialogue between science, policy, and society in policy deliberation. So far, engagement efforts have been made to encourage citizen participation in knowledge production via, for example, citizen science. At EU level means to encourage public participation have included a variety of online mechanisms for spreading information and promoting public deliberation. Despite these developments, the involvement of the general public in policy-making at the EU level has been rather inconsistent to date. In this article, we evaluate online science cafés as potential means to encourage dialogue between science, policy, and society; we ask what elements in their design and implementation are essential for inclusive dialogue between science, policy, and society. Our findings emphasise iterative dialogue when approaching multi-scalar challenges. This has important implications for developing legitimate participation across Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Liisa Varumo & Riikka Paloniemi & Eszter Kelemen, 0. "Challenges and solutions in developing legitimate online participation for EU biodiversity and ecosystem services policies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 571-580.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:47:y::i:4:p:571-580.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaa036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:47:y::i:4:p:571-580.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.