IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v47y2020i3p434-445..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial selection versus natural selection: Which causes the Matthew effect of science funding allocation in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Gupeng Zhang
  • Libin Xiong
  • Xiao Wang
  • Jianing Dong
  • Hongbo Duan

Abstract

To investigate either artificial or natural selection leads to the Matthew effect in the science funding allocation and its consequences, this study retrieves 274,732 publications by Chinese scientists from the Web of Science and examines how the disparity of science funding determines scientists’ research performance. We employ the Negative Binomial Model and other models to regress the publication’s citation times, which measures the research performance, on the number of funding grants and their amounts of currency that the publication receives, which measures the disparity of science funding. The empirical results suggest an inverted U-shaped relationship. However, the optimum number of funding grants far exceeds the actual number that most publications receive, implying that increasing the funding for academic research positively impacts scientists’ research performance. The natural disparity thus plays a major role in distributing the science funding. Additionally, China’s publication-based academic assessment system may be another main cause.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupeng Zhang & Libin Xiong & Xiao Wang & Jianing Dong & Hongbo Duan, 2020. "Artificial selection versus natural selection: Which causes the Matthew effect of science funding allocation in China?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 434-445.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:47:y:2020:i:3:p:434-445.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scaa024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Rong & Huang, Mengyuan & Zhang, Junfeng & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "On the Matthew effect in a multi-airport system: Evidence from the viewpoint of airport green efficiency," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Zhou Mo & Zhang Yujie & Lei Jiasu & Tan Xiaowen, 2022. "Early firm engagement, government research funding, and the privatization of public knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4797-4826, August.
    3. Shang, Jing & Zeng, Mingbin & Zhang, Gupeng, 2022. "Investigating the mentorship effect on the academic success of young scientists: An empirical study of the 985 project universities of China," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:47:y:2020:i:3:p:434-445.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.