IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v45y2018i2p246-256..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On The Route Towards Renewal? The Polish Academy Of Sciences In Post-Socialist Context

Author

Listed:
  • Steffi Heinecke

Abstract

Investigating the question of scientific via organizational renewal, this article adds an original perspective to the study of public research systems in Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). Though previous studies have focused predominantly on policy, this article explores organizational structures that affect the performance of public research organizations (PROs) in a post-socialist setting. After assessing the performance of the Polish Academy of Sciences in terms of both research output and portfolio using bibliometric data, the article explores organizational factors linked to the generation of new scientific knowledge. Through this in-depth analysis, links between the specific historical context of post-socialist Poland and the Academy’s ability to conduct novel scientific research are uncovered.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffi Heinecke, 2018. "On The Route Towards Renewal? The Polish Academy Of Sciences In Post-Socialist Context," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 246-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:246-256.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scx063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongbo Shi & Yeyanran Ge, 2019. "Academic Engagement and Commercialization in an Institutional Transition Environment: Evidence from Shanghai Maritime University," Papers 1901.07725, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:246-256.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.