IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i6p775-788..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More than research intermediaries: a descriptive study of the impact and value of learned societies in the UK social sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Hewitt
  • Robert Dingwall
  • Ilke Turkmendag

Abstract

The role of learned societies, mutual organisations of scholars with a common interest in an academic discipline or research field, is a poorly understood part of the ecosystem for knowledge exchange and dissemination. As such, that role is vulnerable to the unintended consequences of actions by other institutions within this ecosystem. This article reports a study of the social science learned societies operating in the UK in 2012/13. It describes their current activities and sustaining revenue streams, develops a methodology for documenting these, and establishes a baseline for future work to assess the impact of changes in their organisational environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Hewitt & Robert Dingwall & Ilke Turkmendag, 2017. "More than research intermediaries: a descriptive study of the impact and value of learned societies in the UK social sciences," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 775-788.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:775-788.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scx013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikael Laakso & Anna-Maija, 2023. "European scholarly journals from small- and mid-size publishers: mapping journals and public funding mechanisms," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 445-456.
    2. Lisa Matthias & Najko Jahn & Mikael Laakso, 2019. "The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-29, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:775-788.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.