IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v42y2015i2p228-241..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models and visions of science–policy interaction: Remarks from a Delphi study in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Valente
  • Tommaso Castellani
  • Maja Larsen
  • Arja R. Aro

Abstract

In recent decades, many disciplines have dealt with the relationship between scientific research and policy-making, and many different models for science–policy interactions have been proposed. This paper aims to investigate the models of science–policy interaction implicitly or explicitly adopted by stakeholders, by means of a Delphi study performed with Italian researchers, politicians, doctors and journalists. The study was developed within the framework of the European project on Research into Policy to Enhance Physical Activity, which aimed to improve evidence-informed policy-making using the field of physical activity as the case study. Our results show the persistence of the traditional linear model and how it coexists with subsequent models in the same individual visions.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Valente & Tommaso Castellani & Maja Larsen & Arja R. Aro, 2015. "Models and visions of science–policy interaction: Remarks from a Delphi study in Italy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 228-241.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:42:y:2015:i:2:p:228-241.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scu039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:42:y:2015:i:2:p:228-241.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.