IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v41y2014i2p234-244..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The instrumental use of technical doubts: Technological controversies, investment decisions and air pollution controls in the global shipping industry

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bloor
  • Helen Sampson
  • Susan Baker
  • Katrin Dahlgren

Abstract

In principle, the installation of emissions abatement technology (otherwise known as scrubbers) on ships would reduce air pollution and premature deaths from disease and allow vessels to save costs by continuing to burn cheap high-sulphur residual fuel oil. But very few scrubbers have been installed. A recent House of Commons Select Committee Inquiry was unable to decide between the competing technical claims of scrubber manufacturers and ship operators, over whether scrubber technology was sufficiently ‘mature’ for present installation. From the perspective of science and technology studies, this paper draws on interviews with stakeholders and written and oral evidence to the committee to argue that this was a dispute, which foregrounded technical arguments for investment decisions that were actually being taken on economic grounds. Where scientific/technical closure is a matter of communal understanding rather than technical demonstration, technical doubt can be used instrumentally for economic reasons to delay closure.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bloor & Helen Sampson & Susan Baker & Katrin Dahlgren, 2014. "The instrumental use of technical doubts: Technological controversies, investment decisions and air pollution controls in the global shipping industry," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 234-244.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:41:y:2014:i:2:p:234-244.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/sct050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:41:y:2014:i:2:p:234-244.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.