IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v39y2012i5p655-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network governance of innovation policies: The Technological Plan in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Laranja

Abstract

Policy makers are responding to the challenges of governing increasingly broad, complex, dynamic and multi-sectoral domains of innovation policy, with more flexible forms of governance. This paper analyses how the coordination of a wider innovation policy agenda was recently dealt with in Portugal. We argue that the Technological Plan for 2005--9, is an interesting case of network governance (NG) that contrasts with the closed corporatist structures and vertical path dependencies and divisions that had characterized Portuguese governance of innovation policy in the past. Although NG is not a new phenomenon, there is no comprehensive theory to help explain under which conditions NG can contribute to improve the effectiveness of systemic innovation. Our main aim is to assess the effects of such new networked coordination in terms of better articulation, control of implementation and monitoring of progress towards pre-defined objectives, over a wider innovation agenda. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Laranja, 2012. "Network governance of innovation policies: The Technological Plan in Portugal," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(5), pages 655-668, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:39:y:2012:i:5:p:655-668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scs043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerald Midgley & Erik Lindhult, 2021. "A systems perspective on systemic innovation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 635-670, October.
    2. Böhle, Knud & Moniz, António, 2015. "No Countries for Old Technology Assessment? Sketching the Efforts and Opportunities to Establish Parliamentary TA in Spain and Portugal," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 29-44.
    3. Bonfim, Leandro R.C. & Segatto, Andréa P. & Gonçalves, Sandro A., 2018. "A conical-helix model of technology transfer and public-private partnerships for technological development in Brazilian public health," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 110-123.
    4. Ainhoa Arrona, 2017. "Can interpretive policy analysis contribute to a critical scholarship on regional innovation policy studies?," Working Papers 2017R01, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:39:y:2012:i:5:p:655-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.