IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v38y2011i5p391-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory paternalism: citizens' conferences in Austrian technology governance

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Degelsegger
  • Helge Torgersen

Abstract

Citizens' conferences as a form of participatory technology assessment (pTA) are said to increase democratic legitimacy, take up lay knowledge and improve technological solutions. Today it is part of science and technology policy rhetoric and, sometimes, practice. We confront some elements of the scholarly discussion on pTA with policy-makers' understandings of the process in Austria. Here, participation is often framed as a form of public relations and a sensor for public sentiments rather than as a forum of multiple rationalities and co-development of policy projects. This understanding can be related to underlying conceptions of democracy and the public. We conclude that governance styles would have to change before pTA could become more than a laboratory experiment. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Degelsegger & Helge Torgersen, 2011. "Participatory paternalism: citizens' conferences in Austrian technology governance," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(5), pages 391-402, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:38:y:2011:i:5:p:391-402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234211X12924093660679
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:38:y:2011:i:5:p:391-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.