IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v38y2011i2p109-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutions and practice in cross-sector research collaboration: conceptual considerations with empirical illustrations from the German science sector

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Schiller

Abstract

This article introduces a framework for analysing the interplay of institutions and practice for cross-sector research collaboration (CSRC) between science and industry. The German science sector, which has been reformed to a remarkable degree during the last 10 years, is used as an empirical case study. The article assesses the impact of selected recent reforms on the stimulation and outcome of CSRC. In general, positive impacts on CSRC in terms of governance, scope and rewards are expected. However, some of the reforms are yet to be fully implemented and some even conflict with existing practice. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Schiller, 2011. "Institutions and practice in cross-sector research collaboration: conceptual considerations with empirical illustrations from the German science sector," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 109-121, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:38:y:2011:i:2:p:109-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234211X12924093660075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:38:y:2011:i:2:p:109-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.