IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v37y2010i9p665-677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Flink
  • Ulrich Schreiterer

Abstract

In the wake of burgeoning international activities and collaborative venues in S&T, rich industrial countries have taken to science diplomacy to strengthen their innovative capacities or to foster cross-border civil relations. Apart from some theoretical considerations and empirical case studies, however, we still know little about its different objectives or the strategies, administrative procedures and resources deployed at this fuzzy intersection of S&T policy and foreign affairs. Presenting findings of a comparative study of six countries' science diplomacy, this article puts forward some simple heuristics to account for different programmatic styles and organizational patterns in this emerging field. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Flink & Ulrich Schreiterer, 2010. "Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(9), pages 665-677, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:37:y:2010:i:9:p:665-677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234210X12778118264530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Szkarłat, 2020. "Science diplomacy of Poland," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    3. Mohammed Mutala Surazu & Dr. Jelica Stefanović-štambuk, 2023. "The Cause of Diplomatic Failure in the Sahel Region and the Rising Coups," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1005-1012, December.
    4. Troy J. Bouffard & Ekaterina Uryupova & Klaus Dodds & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Alec P. Bennett & Dmitry Streletskiy, 2021. "Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Alexander Raev & Ellen Minkman, 2020. "Emotional policies: Introducing branding as a tool for science diplomacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Caroline S Wagner & Denis F, 2023. "China’s use of formal science and technology agreements as a tool of diplomacy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 807-817.
    7. Marguin, Séverine & Haus, Juliane & Heinrich, Anna Juliane & Kahl, Antje & Schendzielorz, Cornelia & Singh, Ajit, 2021. "Positionality Reloaded: Debating the Dimensions of Reflexivity in the Relationship Between Science and Society: An Editorial," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 7-34.
    8. Derya Buyuktanir Karacan, 2021. "Science diplomacy as a foreign policy tool for Turkey and the ramifications of collaboration with the EU," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Rüffin, Nicolas & Rüland, Anna-Lena, 2022. "Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58((Art. No.), pages 1-12.
    10. Simone Turchetti & Roberto Lalli, 2020. "Envisioning a “science diplomacy 2.0”: on data, global challenges, and multi-layered networks," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Andrei Polejack & Sigi Gruber & Mary S. Wisz, 2021. "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Charlotte Rungius & Tim Flink, 2020. "Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 1-1.
    14. Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, 2020. "Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Elisabeth Epping, 2020. "Lifting the smokescreen of science diplomacy: comparing the political instrumentation of science and innovation centres," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Anna‐Lena Rüland & Nicolas Rüffin, 2024. "A comparison of British and German parliamentary discourses on science diplomacy over time," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 247-259, May.
    17. Tim Flink, 2022. "Taking the pulse of science diplomacy and developing practices of valuation [The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 191-200.
    18. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:37:y:2010:i:9:p:665-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.