IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v36y2009i8p649-652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting patent policy right: a conclusion to a special issue on the European patent system

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J Elsmore

Abstract

This special issue has addressed key concerns within the European patent system, by looking at law, economics and political science. The conclusion here brings out certain themes from this discussion and considers a key unmentioned policy option regarding the economic mission of the patent system. Other pragmatic concerns of public relations and personnel are mentioned. The overall message is that we have faced challenges before in designing our patent systems. In fact, the current pressure from technology and patent users, as well as public opinion, gives those of us interested in the system a chance to properly reconsider why we have a patent system and make sure that it fits our needs, both now and in the future. The hope is that we end up realigning interests so that we are working more towards the key welfare goals of encouraging invention and the diffusion of knowledge within the European patent system. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J Elsmore, 2009. "Getting patent policy right: a conclusion to a special issue on the European patent system," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(8), pages 649-652, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:8:p:649-652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234209X474561
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:8:p:649-652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.