IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v36y2009i8p619-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing the patent system in Europe: the EPO's supranational autonomy and its need for a regulatory perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ingrid Schneider

Abstract

The European Patent Office (EPO), the executive branch of the intergovernmental European Patent Organisation (EPOrg), enjoys considerable administrative autonomy. Its tacit policy-making practices have important effects on European patent integration. Considering agencification and the relationship between autonomy and control, and then epistemic communities and their role in policy-making, this paper explores the supranational autonomy of the EPO, and analyses the core mechanisms for the adjustment of substantive patent law to new technological fields. The analysis assesses how the biotechnology patent directive (98/44/EC) was transposed from the EU to the EPOrg system, and how synchronization between the EU and the EPO has occurred. After identifying various deficits in the democratic legitimacy and the accountability of the EPO system, some effects of this transposition on formal and substantive legitimacy issues are discussed. Finally, several normative and practical suggestions for a more comprehensive and accountable co-evolution of the European patent system are made. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingrid Schneider, 2009. "Governing the patent system in Europe: the EPO's supranational autonomy and its need for a regulatory perspective," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(8), pages 619-629, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:8:p:619-629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234209X474570
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:8:p:619-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.