IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v36y2009i6p483-496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The trajectory of scientific citizenship in Denmark: Changing balances between public competence and public participation

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Mejlgaard

Abstract

The understanding of relations between science and the public is divided between two competing paradigms: one that focuses on citizen competence and one-way dissemination of knowledge, and another that emphasizes public participation and dialogue. This article proposes an integrative framework that regards competence and participation as important dimensions of ‘scientific citizenship’, and focuses on the changing balance between these dimensions. Recounting developments in Denmark, it is argued that the trajectory of scientific citizenship in Denmark runs counter to the broader European trend. In the 2000s, Danish policies and social practices concerned with the interplay between science and the public have been highly focused on one-way dissemination, and the traditional ‘Danish model’ of institutionalized, deliberative public participation in science and technology decision-making, which developed in the course of the 1980s and received international renown, has lost much of its influence. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Mejlgaard, 2009. "The trajectory of scientific citizenship in Denmark: Changing balances between public competence and public participation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(6), pages 483-496, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:6:p:483-496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234209X460962
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:36:y:2009:i:6:p:483-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.