IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v34y2007i5p345-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suspicious cartographers: Some realities of research into stakeholder understanding of the causes and possible prevention of breast cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Cinderby
  • Laura Potts

Abstract

In this paper we are interested in gaining better understanding of how communities of interest participate effectively in risk governance, particularly when the dominant discourse has tended to be dominated by science practitioners rather its publics. One approach used to illuminate this understanding was the technique of participatory geographic information systems (specifically an approach termed geographic information systems for participation (GIS-P)), which was used here as a means to improve communication about possible environmental risks of breast cancer. The merits and outcomes of applying this technique are investigated and the implications for wider participation in contentious ‘scientific’ issues discussed, with close examination of the mutual suspicion that persisted among the different communities of interest concerned about breast cancer causation. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Cinderby & Laura Potts, 2007. "Suspicious cartographers: Some realities of research into stakeholder understanding of the causes and possible prevention of breast cancer," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(5), pages 345-354, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:34:y:2007:i:5:p:345-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234207X227143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:34:y:2007:i:5:p:345-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.