IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v34y2007i4p251-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology, governance and place: Situating biotechnology in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Harsh
  • James Smith

Abstract

Following the pioneering work of several Latin American anthropologists, reconnecting to the idea of place and examining networked strategies of marginalised actors are explored as useful approaches to analyse the governance of biotechnology in an African context. Such place-based approaches provide an opportunity to marry more traditional understandings of macro levels of governance with the politics of how local institutions assign needs, build relationships and manage change. The argument is illustrated via case studies of several tissue culture banana projects in Kenya. The cases show that a place-based approach to governance can be both empirically pragmatic and theoretically useful by providing a way to focus on the location of decision-making, and by putting politics and power differentials between actors more firmly within governance frameworks. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Harsh & James Smith, 2007. "Technology, governance and place: Situating biotechnology in Kenya," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 251-260, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:34:y:2007:i:4:p:251-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234207X214444
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ann Njoki Kingiri, 2010. "Experts to the rescue? An analysis of the role of experts in biotechnology regulation in Kenya," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 325-340.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:34:y:2007:i:4:p:251-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.