IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v34y2007i1p55-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changing regimes of science and politics: Comparative and transnational perspectives for a world in transition

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Barben

Abstract

Against the background of previous historical changes in the configuration of science and politics, this article explores the particular new qualities of more recent changes in the relationship between these two domains. Reconfigurations of politics are outlined at the national, supranational, and international levels, while reconfigurations of science are presented with regard to four high-technologies (nuclear, information and communication, bio, and nano-technologies), hereby aiming at the interdependencies between politics and science. To this end, a regime analytical framework is developed that allows for a focus on the configuration of science and technology in society ‘as a whole,’ paying attention to comparative variation and the significance of institutions, practices, and discourses. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Barben, 2007. "Changing regimes of science and politics: Comparative and transnational perspectives for a world in transition," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 55-69, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:34:y:2007:i:1:p:55-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234207X193196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaw, Sara E. & Greenhalgh, Trisha, 2008. "Best research - For what? Best health - For whom? A critical exploration of primary care research using discourse analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2506-2519, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:34:y:2007:i:1:p:55-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.