IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v33y2006i9p627-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science and technology in global cooperation: The case of the United Nations and UNESCO

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus-Heinrich Standke

Abstract

This is on the Rise and Fall of S&T on the global agenda. The 1963 Geneva UN Conference wanted the S&T divide between rich and poor countries to be bridged by systematic international cooperation. The later North-South confrontation gave the transfer of knowledge a decisive role. Come the 1979 Vienna Conference, fewer UN agencies participated. Twenty years on, UNESCO and ICSU had a World Science Conference in Budapest; the UN and other agencies were bystanders. The focus was on S and not the T. The end of the Cold War and the ongoing globalisation led to new S&T partnerships. UN and its agencies face an increasingly critical attitude from their member states on S&T, aggravated by there now being no UN system-wide approach. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus-Heinrich Standke, 2006. "Science and technology in global cooperation: The case of the United Nations and UNESCO," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(9), pages 627-646, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:33:y:2006:i:9:p:627-646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154306781778641
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sam Robinson & Matthew Adamson & Gordon Barrett & Lif Lund & Simone Turchetti & Aya Homei & Péter Marton & Leah Aronowsky & Iqra Choudry & Johan Gärdebo & Jaehwan Hyun & Gerardo Ienna & Carringtone Ki, 2023. "The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 749-758.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:33:y:2006:i:9:p:627-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.