IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v33y2006i2p125-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The South African national system of innovation: From constructed crisis to constructed advantage?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Kahn

Abstract

The paper examines how the South African national system of innovation (NSI) has evolved through the transition from apartheid to democracy. To provide structure to this analysis Kim's 1998 concept of the ‘constructed crisis’ in firms is applied at the level of the state. This schema is found to be useful given the complex forces shaping the young state. The origins of the NSI are examined along with emerging science and technology policy and data from the national surveys of research and development (R&D) and other sources. This allows for examination of trends over time, R&D organisational concentration and focus areas. As appropriate we suggest interpretations consistent with the constructed crisis model. While the NSI remained robust in the transition to democracy the human resources nexus jeopardises more rapid growth and development. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Kahn, 2006. "The South African national system of innovation: From constructed crisis to constructed advantage?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 125-136, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:33:y:2006:i:2:p:125-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154306781779109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nelson Casimiro Zavale & Patrício Vitorino Langa, 2018. "University-industry linkages’ literature on Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic literature review and bibliometric account," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 1-49, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:33:y:2006:i:2:p:125-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.