IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v30y2003i3p219-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics, risk management, World Trade Organisation governance and the limits of legalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Joerges
  • Jürgen Neyer

Abstract

The regulation of risks and the devising of appropriate institutional structures to democratise expertise rank high on the agenda of international governance. The potential of the European Union to cope with these challenges seems superior to that of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The WTO institutional set up is still largely dominated by inter-executive multilateralism and leaves little scope for transnational deliberative policy formation. When confronted with conflicting risk policies, the WTO should therefore not try to adjudicate such conflicts; it should rather search a middle ground between politics and law. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Joerges & Jürgen Neyer, 2003. "Politics, risk management, World Trade Organisation governance and the limits of legalisation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 219-225, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:30:y:2003:i:3:p:219-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154303781780498
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joerges, Christian, 2005. "Juridification patterns for social regulation and the WTO: A theoretical framework," TranState Working Papers 17, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Michael Barnett, 2016. "Accountability and global governance: The view from paternalism," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 134-148, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:30:y:2003:i:3:p:219-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.