IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v29y2002i4p267-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry responses to the European controversy over agricultural biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Gérald Assouline
  • Pierre-Benoit Joly

Abstract

Since the late 1990s there has been a great increase in the web of stakeholders participating in the public controversy on agricultural biotechnology, for example, about genetically-modified (GM) crops. Agricultural supply companies initially played a central role in the policy process at national and European levels, but public protest led to economic blockages and a regulatory impasse. Divergent accounts of sustainability underlie the conflicts. As a result of the controversy, innovation priorities have become more accountable to deliberative processes. Companies face the challenge of accommodating or shaping European processes, such as those concerning agricultural development models, environmental values, policy-making procedures, and citizens' participation. There are difficulties for companies in responding to the new policy context and stakeholder roles in this volatile industrial sector. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Gérald Assouline & Pierre-Benoit Joly, 2002. "Industry responses to the European controversy over agricultural biotechnology," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(4), pages 267-275, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:267-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154302781780958
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:267-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.