IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v29y2002i4p253-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The life science industry sector: Evolution of agro-biotechnology in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Chataway
  • David Wield

Abstract

This article reports on a detailed study of large agro-biotechnology companies, conducted during the recent period of rapid industrial restructuring. The concept of life science synergy, involving a useful cross-fertilisation of ideas between the development of new drugs and new crop protection products, has floundered. Although negative public reaction to GM (genetically modified) crop development is a significant cause, our research suggests that there are other more subtle causes, such as organisational culture differences between agro-chemicals and biotechnology disciplines and between seeds and chemicals firms. We found three distinct approaches to life science and technology trajectory-seeking in top agro-biotechnology companies. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Chataway & David Wield, 2002. "The life science industry sector: Evolution of agro-biotechnology in Europe," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(4), pages 253-258, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:253-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154302781780949
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chataway, Joanna & Tait, Joyce & Wield, David, 2004. "Understanding company R&D strategies in agro-biotechnology: trajectories and blind spots," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 1041-1057, September.
    2. Wield, David & Tait, Joyce & Chataway, Joanna & Mittra, James & Mastroeni, Michele, 2017. "Conceptualising and practising multiple knowledge interactions in the life sciences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 308-315.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:253-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.