IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v28y2001i6p438-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social science political counseling: The good, the bad and the enticed

Author

Listed:
  • Frans A J Birrer

Abstract

A major task for Renn's “social science political counseling” is to address non-ideal behavior by actors, who are often entangled in systems of subliminal enticement. Procedural checks and balances are crucial, as is ethos. How experts combine inputs from various contexts requires special attention, particularly to how expert claims are validated. We should not simply assume one common rationality, but use this framework of subliminal enticement to look for a better understanding of the reasons and circumstances that make viewpoints differ. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Frans A J Birrer, 2001. "Social science political counseling: The good, the bad and the enticed," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(6), pages 438-440, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:438-440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154301781781282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:438-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.