IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v28y2001i6p423-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The challenge ahead for deliberative democracy: In reply to Weale

Author

Listed:
  • Michel van Eeten

Abstract

If new democratic practices are more important for increasing the deliberative capacity of a political system, rather than the level of political participation, as Weale argues, then proponents of deliberative democracy have to address a critical missing link in their thinking. Rather than blaming vested power interests for the lack of influence of the new democratic practices, the proponents themselves have to answer how the outcomes of these practices can be understood, captured and transferred into wider political processes. In the absence of such an answer, blaming vested power interests is little more than an admission of weakness of an intrinsically flawed school of thought. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel van Eeten, 2001. "The challenge ahead for deliberative democracy: In reply to Weale," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(6), pages 423-426, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:423-426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154301781781200
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Owens & Tim Rayner & Olivia Bina, 2004. "New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(11), pages 1943-1959, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:423-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.