IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v28y2001i6p403-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy and science: Options for democratisation in European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Martin de Jong
  • Maarten Mentzel

Abstract

Despite the institutional complications involved in bridging the gap between experts and citizens, the issue of participatory and deliberative decision-making and democracy has remained firmly on the political and policy agendas. Citizens in most western nations have high levels of education and, as a result, are also increasingly qualified to question decisions made by authorities. This special issue is a quest for innovative institutional and discursive solutions to bridge the gap and make technically complex policies both better informed and more legitimate, for instance, by installing lay panels, hearings, parliamentary commissions etc. Examples have been taken from experiences in Britain, Germany, France, Finland and the European Union. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin de Jong & Maarten Mentzel, 2001. "Policy and science: Options for democratisation in European countries," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(6), pages 403-412, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:403-412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154301781781228
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:403-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.