IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v28y2001i1p49-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing university research in the triple helix

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Ernø-Kjølhede
  • Kenneth Husted
  • Mette Mønsted
  • Søren Barlebo Wenneberg

Abstract

This paper argues the need for a new approach to the management of academic researchers and their research work. It is held that the requirement for a new management paradigm at the universities is accentuated by all the significant challenges in the knowledge production system (described as mode 2, triple helix, post-academic science and so on). The paper also sketches an outline of an approach to micro-level management of academic researchers, which seeks to strike a balance between autonomy for the academics and organisational steering. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Ernø-Kjølhede & Kenneth Husted & Mette Mønsted & Søren Barlebo Wenneberg, 2001. "Managing university research in the triple helix," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 49-55, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:1:p:49-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/spp/28.1.49
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frederiksen, Frode & Hansson, Finn & Wenneberg, Søren, 2001. "Knowledge Assessment in the Agora," Working Papers 14/2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    2. Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Smeby, Jens-Christian, 2005. "Industry funding and university professors' research performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 932-950, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:1:p:49-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.