IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v27y2000i4p293-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UK BSE crisis: Strengths and weaknesses of existing conceptual approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Eve Seguin

Abstract

The UK media have paid much more attention to the BSE crisis than have social scientists. Yet, the BSE saga is one of the best opportunities we have to explore the link between science and politics. An attempt must therefore be made to evaluate whether satisfactory explanations of the crisis have been proposed by social scientists. The present paper is a review of the three explanations or lines of argument that can be extracted from existing studies of the BSE crisis. The strengths and weaknesses of the three lines of argument are then indicated. Finally, a new perspective for the analysis of the BSE crisis is outlined, which is rooted in the analysis of scientific discourse. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Eve Seguin, 2000. "The UK BSE crisis: Strengths and weaknesses of existing conceptual approaches," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 293-301, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:4:p:293-301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154300781781931
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:sae:envval:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:195-224 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mercedes Bleda & Simon Shackley, 2012. "Simulation Modelling as a Theory Building Tool: The Formation of Risk Perceptions," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(2), pages 1-2.
    3. Hosein, Ian & Whitley, Edgar A., 2002. "The regulation of electronic commerce : learning from the UK's RIP act," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 271, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:4:p:293-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.