IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v27y2000i3p220-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postscript to special issue on interactive social science

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Caswill
  • Elizabeth Shove

Abstract

This postscript is a reflection on the wider implications of this discussion of interactive social science. What lessons have been learned about new knowledge, legitimacy, theory, relevance, power and evaluation? What new questions have arisen? Re-invigorated by debate about interactive research, this argues that these should be reinstated as topics of popular discussion across the full range of social science. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Caswill & Elizabeth Shove, 2000. "Postscript to special issue on interactive social science," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 220-222, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:3:p:220-222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154300781781986
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karl Robertsen & Harald Knudsen, 2006. "Combined seminar and internship in real estate management education," ERES eres2006_edu_103, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:3:p:220-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.