IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v27y2000i3p183-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactive social science in practice: New approaches to the production of knowledge and their implications

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Baldwin

Abstract

Working in a unit doing policy relevant research on poverty, disability, health and social care necessarily involves interaction with a range of users. Some of the most difficult challenges are posed by disabled activists, who assert that the methods conventionally used by social scientists are exploitative and oppressive; they make demands ranging from sharing power more equally in research to shifting power completely to the ‘user’ group. These are difficult and threatening assertions for social scientists to deal with. They require us to take stock honestly of what we are about, without ceding our critical faculties. Social scientists need to develop a common language for the skills interactive research calls for and discussion of how to cultivate them. They need to talk about the approaches that work well and less well in different settings and with different stakeholders. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Baldwin, 2000. "Interactive social science in practice: New approaches to the production of knowledge and their implications," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 183-194, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:3:p:183-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154300781782048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia Medupin, 2020. "Women in Environmental Sciences (WiES) and The UN SDGs: A Catalyst for Achieving a Sustainable Future for All," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Borst, Robert A.J. & Kok, Maarten Olivier & O’Shea, Alison J. & Pokhrel, Subhash & Jones, Teresa H. & Boaz, Annette, 2019. "Envisioning and shaping translation of knowledge into action: A comparative case-study of stakeholder engagement in the development of a European tobacco control tool," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 917-923.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:3:p:183-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.