IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v25y1998i4p265-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sydney water contamination crisis: Manufacturing dissent

Author

Listed:
  • Lyn Carson
  • Stuart White

Abstract

The widely publicised contamination of Sydney's water supply in July 1998 felt like a crisis to affected Sydney residents but the rhetoric did not match the reality. We are interested in the way our reality is constructed, the way we manufacture consent or dissent, the way in which some knowledge is privileged and the way that power is attached to this knowledge. The Sydney Water Contamination Crisis sparked our interest because it proved to be an excellent event to watch: we could daily track the construction of ‘truth’, the attempts to unravel or deconstruct this ‘truth’. It was also a fascinating study in paternalism and an example of public exclusion from the decision-making process. We speculate on some alternative decision-making approaches which might help us avoid a recurrence of the Sydney case study. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyn Carson & Stuart White, 1998. "Sydney water contamination crisis: Manufacturing dissent," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 265-271, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:25:y:1998:i:4:p:265-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/spp/25.4.265
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:25:y:1998:i:4:p:265-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.