IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v24y1997i2p70-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A policy for science innovation: the New Zealand experience

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Simpson
  • John Craig

Abstract

This paper explores the characteristics of Science and Technology policy for today's advanced industrial societies. It counterposes two distinct models, the traditional and the emergent, for the production of new knowledge (science innovation) and examines the policy implications of each. Five dimensions are drawn out from this analysis and are then applied to a case study based on recent policy reforms in the New Zealand science sector. The analysis shows that New Zealand's science policy is evolving towards a consistent and coherent expression of the emergent model for innovation. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Simpson & John Craig, 1997. "A policy for science innovation: the New Zealand experience," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 70-78, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:24:y:1997:i:2:p:70-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/spp/24.2.70
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Marsh, 2000. "Fostering Innovation in a Small Open Economy: The Case of the New Zealand Biotechnology Sector," Working Papers in Economics 00/01, University of Waikato.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:24:y:1997:i:2:p:70-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.