IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v24y1997i2p113-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translating national R&D investment into trade success: An exploration into some dynamic linkages

Author

Listed:
  • Peter L. Daniels

Abstract

Trends and lag intervals in the relationship between national technology investment and related trade performance are investigated. These concerns are critical for the prescription and implementation of science and technology policy focused upon building international trade competitiveness. Using a sample of over 30 nations, a lag interval of less than three years generates the strongest cross-country correlations between R&D investment and employment and trade success. When changes in technology effort and trade in technology-intensive manufactures indicators are examined during the 1980s, mixed results arise (unlike the marked positive link of previous studies focused on ratios at one point in time). Increased investment in many older industrialised nations do not appear to be ‘paying off’ in terms of trade success. This may be evidence of internationalisation acting to dissolve the geographical nexus between efforts to build technological competitiveness and economic returns. Some marginal weakening in the association between technology investment and trade is also observed when their levels are compared in the 1970s and 1980s. National technology investment indicators remain as good predictors of international trade competitiveness in the late 1980s. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter L. Daniels, 1997. "Translating national R&D investment into trade success: An exploration into some dynamic linkages," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 113-122, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:24:y:1997:i:2:p:113-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/spp/24.2.113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:24:y:1997:i:2:p:113-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.