IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v23y1996i1p45-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proof and the computer: some issues raised by the formal verification of computer systems

Author

Listed:
  • Donald MacKenzie

Abstract

Formal verification is the attempt to give a mathematical proof that the design of a computer system is a correct implementation of its specification. This effort raises questions about what ‘proof’ is. Two main conceptions — formal proof and rigorous argument — are identified, and it is suggested that they are underpinned by the disciplinary authorities, respectively, of logic and mathematics. The views of specialists in formal verification about the degree of certainty that can be claimed for verification are examined, and it is argued that the temptations to claims of certainty unwittingly offered by the commercial and regulatory environment must be resisted Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald MacKenzie, 1996. "Proof and the computer: some issues raised by the formal verification of computer systems," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 45-53, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:23:y:1996:i:1:p:45-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/spp/23.1.45
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:23:y:1996:i:1:p:45-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.