IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v8y1999i1p39-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On-line indicators of Danish biomedical publication behaviour 1988–96: international visibility, impact and co-operation in a Scandinavian and world context

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Ingwersen

Abstract

The development from 1988 to 1996 of research and publication patterns in Danish biomedical research is investigated in a Scandinavian and world context using on-line retrieval and the National Science Indicators. The aim is to demonstrate seven central publication indicators and determine changes in research behaviour and policy over time in a domain. Scandinavia's position is under pressure and weakening, in publication and citation impact levels. Only Finland demonstrates a steady increase in research activity. The Danish position is stable but the pattern of research publication is changing dramatically because of a continuous shift to publish in Science Citation Index journals and an intensive enhancement of international collaboration, in range of co-operating countries and in volume. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Ingwersen, 1999. "On-line indicators of Danish biomedical publication behaviour 1988–96: international visibility, impact and co-operation in a Scandinavian and world context," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 39-45, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:1:p:39-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154499781777685
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Ingwersen, 2000. "The International Visibility and Citation Impact of Scandinavian Research Articles in Selected Social Science Fields: The Decay of a Myth," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(1), pages 39-61, August.
    2. Grant Lewison, 2001. "The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(1), pages 29-43, September.
    3. Wolfgang Glänzel, 2000. "Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 48(2), pages 121-150, September.
    4. Ramesh Kundra & Dimiter Tomov, 2001. "Collaboration Patterns in Indian and Bulgarian Epidemiology of Neoplasms in Medline for 1966–1999," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 519-523, November.
    5. Daisy Jacobs & Peter Ingwersen, 2000. "A Bibliometric Study of the Publication Patterns in the Sciences of South African Scholars 1981–96," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(1), pages 75-93, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:1:p:39-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.