IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v7y1998i2p113-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation practices of scientific research in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Jan van Steen
  • Marcel Eijffinger

Abstract

This article takes stock of Dutch evaluation practices for publicly funded basic and strategic research in three different contexts: institutional strategy formulation; allocative decision-making; and research and science policy strategy. The different evaluation practices are dealt with in detail, by describing their technical set-up. In conclusion, the main challenge for science policy over the next few years is discussed: how can the different evaluation practices be bridged, including the integration of the societal point of view within evaluation practice. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan van Steen & Marcel Eijffinger, 1998. "Evaluation practices of scientific research in the Netherlands," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 113-122, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:2:p:113-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/7.2.113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandström, Ulf & Van den Besselaar, Peter, 2018. "Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 365-384.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:2:p:113-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.