IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v4y1994i3p161-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New index of R&D purchasing power parities for international comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Takao Kiba
  • Itsuo Sakuma
  • Junichi Kikuchi

Abstract

To make more accurate international comparisons of R&D expenditure, the development of purchasing power parities applicable to R&D expenditure (R&D PPPs) is advocated. These will allow direct comparisons of the quantity of goods and services that can actually be purchased with the R&D expenditure in various countries. A trial calculation was made of R&D PPPs for six major countries. This showed that R&D PPPs against US dollars in 1992 indicates a 17% stronger yen than that of ICP's PPPs and 22% weaker than that of the exchange rate. R&D PPPs give us a truer indication of the R&D situation in the world. This will contribute much to science and technology policy-making and analysis, for instance it can be used to analyse companies' overseas R&D investments. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Takao Kiba & Itsuo Sakuma & Junichi Kikuchi, 1994. "New index of R&D purchasing power parities for international comparisons," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 161-169, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:3:p:161-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/4.3.161
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:3:p:161-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.