IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v4y1994i3p153-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research fellows and employees on the European Union Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP)

Author

Listed:
  • Grant Lewison

Abstract

The EC Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP), 1985–89, supported some 363 fellows to receive “training in research through research” for an average of 15 months in another Member State. In addition, over 400 people were employed on short-term contracts as researchers. These two groups were compared in terms of their prior characteristics, immediate attainments and current situations. Among the findings were that the national distribution was “cohesion-friendly” and favoured the less-favoured Member States, and over 30% of the employees and more than 20% of the fellows gained doctorates. In 1991–92, almost half the fellows and employees were still active in biotechnology research and publishing papers (one in four multi-national), almost half in higher education institutions. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant Lewison, 1994. "Research fellows and employees on the European Union Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP)," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 153-160, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:3:p:153-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/4.3.153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:3:p:153-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.